Pampanga State Agricultural University

Office of the Library Services and Museum

Learning Style and Performance of Junior High School Students Based on Learning Materials (Record no. 16123)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 04465ntm a2200181 a 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 135276
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field 0000000000
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250408094720.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 230403n 000 0 eng d
100 0# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Laureta, Reeku.
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Learning Style and Performance of Junior High School Students Based on Learning Materials
Medium [manuscript] /
Statement of responsibility, etc. Reeku Laureta.
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Magalang, Pampanga :
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Pampanga State Agricultural University,
Date of publication, distribution, etc. April 2019.
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent xiii, 85 leaves ;
Dimensions 28 cm. + 1 computer disc (4 3/4 in.)
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note This study aimed to determine if a learning material presented to a student that matches and does not match his/her learning style may somehow have an effect in his/her academic performance. Specifically, it sought to determine the respondents' learning styles, their performance in the first lesson presented as a hand-out and the second topic presented as an audio-recorded lecture, and the difference between the respondents' academic performance. To achieve the aim of the study, quasi-experimental research design was used. The initial respondents were all grade 7 students taking up English subject. The two learning style tests by O'Brien (1989) and Beatrice (n.d.) was administered to identify their learning style, and the two topics that will be presented to the respondents was picked from their English subject syllabus. The official respondents then read a hand-out for the first lesson, listened to an audio-recorded lecture for the second topic and answered a series of tests after every lesson. Mean and t-test for independent samples were used to analyze the data. Based on the findings, seven (50%) of the official respondents were visual learners and seven (50%) were auditory learners. In the first lesson, the visual learners performed very good, while the auditory learners got a fair performance. In the second lesson, the visual learners performed good, while the auditory learners performed poorly. However, results showed that there is a significant difference between the performance of the visual learners in the first and second lesson while the auditory learners' performance showed no significant difference. This means that unlike the auditory learners who may perform better in either visual or audio formatted learning material, visual learners may perform best only when using a learning Material that match their style.
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note This study aimed to determine if a learning material presented to a student that matches and does not match his/her learning style may somehow have an effect in his/her academic performance. Specifically, it sought to determine the respondents' learning styles, their performance in the first lesson presented as a hand-out and the second topic presented as an audio-recorded lecture, and the difference between the respondents' academic performance. To achieve the aim of the study, quasi-experimental research design was used. The initial respondents were all grade 7 students taking up English subject. The two learning style tests by O'Brien (1989) and Beatrice (n.d.) was administered to identify their learning style, and the two topics that will be presented to the respondents was picked from their English subject syllabus. The official respondents then read a hand-out for the first lesson, listened to an audio-recorded lecture for the second topic and answered a series of tests after every lesson. Mean and t-test for independent samples were used to analyze the data. Based on the findings, seven (50%) of the official respondents were visual learners and seven (50%) were auditory learners. In the first lesson, the visual learners performed very good, while the auditory learners got a fair performance. In the second lesson, the visual learners performed good, while the auditory learners performed poorly. However, results showed that there is a significant difference between the performance of the visual learners in the first and second lesson while the auditory learners' performance showed no significant difference. This means that unlike the auditory learners who may perform better in either visual or audio formatted learning material, visual learners may perform best only when using a learning Material that match their style.
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Alpha Juris C. Macaspac,
Relator term Adviser.
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
      Not for loan PSAU OLM PSAU OLM Dissertation, Theses 04/03/2023   UT L38 2019 UT12898 04/08/2025 04/08/2025 Theses