Pampanga State Agricultural University

Office of the Library Services and Museum

Comparative agricultural university, magalang, pampanga. august 202). study on the effects of grow light on romaine lettuce (lactuca sativa l.) (Record no. 15533)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02495ntm a2200169 a 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 134374
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field 0000000000
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250408094534.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 230130n 000 0 eng d
100 0# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Cabrera, Kzar Dayrit.
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Comparative agricultural university, magalang, pampanga. august 202). study on the effects of grow light on romaine lettuce (lactuca sativa l.)
Medium [manuscript] /
Statement of responsibility, etc. Kzar Dayrit Cabrera.
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Magalang, Pampanga :
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Pampanag State Agricultural University,
Date of publication, distribution, etc. August 2021.
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent xiii, 39 leaves ;
Dimensions 28 cm. + 1 computer disc (4 3/4 in.)
505 0# - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE
Formatted contents note Grow lights are used to supplement the light needs of a plant. LED and CFL are known for being cost-efficient. Lettuce is one of the most consumed high-value crops in some parts of the world. In this study, romaine lettuce was used to compare the effects of different grow lights. This research was conducted in Brgy. San Francisco, Magalang, Pampanga. The researcher used a quantitative study design coupled with Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for statistical calculations. The parameters measured were plant height, number of leaves, quality of the leaf, and root length. The experiment consisted of three (3) treatment groups namely LED, CFL, and sunlight. Results showed that LED-grown lettuce had the highest mean root length, mean increase in height, and mean increase in the number of leaves. Results also showed that LED had a higher light intensity than CFL. Sensory evaluation showed that LED had the highest mean rating in terms of color; while sunlight had the highest in terms of aroma, texture, taste, and general acceptability. All treatments were significant at a 1% value F-test. In cost analysis, LED was more economically viable than CFL. Despite having a longer payback period of LED than CFL, LED still had a higher annual income of Php 258.94 than CFL. In conclusion, LED grow light is a more viable and effective option compared to CFL, and it can be considered as a good supplemental light for deficient sunlight especially during the wet season. CFL grow light can be also used as long as it is 770 lumens or higher. Likewise, it is recommended to plant in different weather conditions using different high-value crops for further studies.
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Olalia, Melissa P.,
Relator term Adviser.
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
      Not for loan PSAU OLM PSAU OLM Dissertation, Theses 01/30/2023   UT C117 2021 UT12319 04/08/2025 04/08/2025 Theses