Comparative agricultural university, magalang, pampanga. august 202). study on the effects of grow light on romaine lettuce (lactuca sativa l.) (Record no. 15533)
[ view plain ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 02495ntm a2200169 a 4500 |
001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
control field | 134374 |
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
control field | 0000000000 |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20250408094534.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | 230130n 000 0 eng d |
100 0# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Cabrera, Kzar Dayrit. |
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Comparative agricultural university, magalang, pampanga. august 202). study on the effects of grow light on romaine lettuce (lactuca sativa l.) |
Medium | [manuscript] / |
Statement of responsibility, etc. | Kzar Dayrit Cabrera. |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Place of publication, distribution, etc. | Magalang, Pampanga : |
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | Pampanag State Agricultural University, |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | August 2021. |
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
Extent | xiii, 39 leaves ; |
Dimensions | 28 cm. + 1 computer disc (4 3/4 in.) |
505 0# - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE | |
Formatted contents note | Grow lights are used to supplement the light needs of a plant. LED and CFL are known for being cost-efficient. Lettuce is one of the most consumed high-value crops in some parts of the world. In this study, romaine lettuce was used to compare the effects of different grow lights. This research was conducted in Brgy. San Francisco, Magalang, Pampanga. The researcher used a quantitative study design coupled with Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for statistical calculations. The parameters measured were plant height, number of leaves, quality of the leaf, and root length. The experiment consisted of three (3) treatment groups namely LED, CFL, and sunlight. Results showed that LED-grown lettuce had the highest mean root length, mean increase in height, and mean increase in the number of leaves. Results also showed that LED had a higher light intensity than CFL. Sensory evaluation showed that LED had the highest mean rating in terms of color; while sunlight had the highest in terms of aroma, texture, taste, and general acceptability. All treatments were significant at a 1% value F-test. In cost analysis, LED was more economically viable than CFL. Despite having a longer payback period of LED than CFL, LED still had a higher annual income of Php 258.94 than CFL. In conclusion, LED grow light is a more viable and effective option compared to CFL, and it can be considered as a good supplemental light for deficient sunlight especially during the wet season. CFL grow light can be also used as long as it is 770 lumens or higher. Likewise, it is recommended to plant in different weather conditions using different high-value crops for further studies. |
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Olalia, Melissa P., |
Relator term | Adviser. |
Withdrawn status | Lost status | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Price effective from | Koha item type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Not for loan | PSAU OLM | PSAU OLM | Dissertation, Theses | 01/30/2023 | UT C117 2021 | UT12319 | 04/08/2025 | 04/08/2025 | Theses |