Acceptability rate of mineral blocks using different materials (Record no. 15519)
[ view plain ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 02417ntm a2200169 a 4500 |
001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
control field | 134360 |
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
control field | 0000000000 |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20250408094533.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | 230130n 000 0 eng d |
100 0# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Serreon, Jerwin Vincent Cancino. |
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Acceptability rate of mineral blocks using different materials |
Medium | [manuscript] / |
Statement of responsibility, etc. | Jerwin Vincent Cancino Serreon. |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Place of publication, distribution, etc. | Magalang, Pampanga : |
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | Pampanag State Agricultural University, |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | September 2021. |
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
Extent | xiv, 50 leaves ; |
Dimensions | 28 cm. + 1 computer disc (4 3/4 in.) |
505 0# - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE | |
Formatted contents note | This study was conducted at Mapifia, Magalang for 21 days to determine the acceptance of mineral blocks using different materials to the carabaos. The test carabaos were given two treatments to consume the mineral block at certain period of time. The data gathered was used to determine the consumption, feed intake and palatability rate. Average Mean, Standard Deviation, and T-test were used as statistical tools to analyze the given data. Results show the comparison in consumption between two treatments. Mineral block (T2) has higher average consumption of the carabaos with a value of 635.10g than mineral block (T1) with a value of 536.67g. Using T-test, it reveals that the treatments were not significant at 95% level of significance since p-value is higher than 0.05, which is 0.097 and mineral block (T2) has higher standard deviation than mineral block (T1) with a value of 497.81g and 277.46g, respectively. The feed imtake of the carabaos in both treatments became faster compared before it was given mineral blocks. There was a difference in palatability of mineral blocks between two treatments. Mineral block (T2) is «ore palatable compared to mineral block (T1), with a value of 127.02g and 107.33g, espectively. T-test, revealed that the treatments were not significant at 95% level of ignificance since p-value is higher than 0.05, which is 0.097. Also, treatment 2 has igher standard deviation than treatment 1 with a value of 99.56g and 55.49¢, spectively. The total cost of producing 110 mineral blocks for treatment 1 was Php 2,040.50 d the total cost of producing 110 mineral blocks for treatment 2 was Php 2,132.00. The st difference between treatments was Php 91.50. |
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Samson, Sidney C., |
Relator term | Adviser. |
Withdrawn status | Lost status | Damaged status | Not for loan | Collection | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Price effective from | Koha item type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Not for loan | BSAg Eng'g | PSAU OLM | PSAU OLM | Dissertation, Theses | 01/30/2023 | UT Se4 2021 | UT12331 | 04/08/2025 | 04/08/2025 | Theses |