Pampanga State Agricultural University

Office of the Library Services and Museum

Acceptability rate of mineral blocks using different materials (Record no. 15519)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02417ntm a2200169 a 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 134360
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field 0000000000
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250408094533.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 230130n 000 0 eng d
100 0# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Serreon, Jerwin Vincent Cancino.
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Acceptability rate of mineral blocks using different materials
Medium [manuscript] /
Statement of responsibility, etc. Jerwin Vincent Cancino Serreon.
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Magalang, Pampanga :
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Pampanag State Agricultural University,
Date of publication, distribution, etc. September 2021.
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent xiv, 50 leaves ;
Dimensions 28 cm. + 1 computer disc (4 3/4 in.)
505 0# - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE
Formatted contents note This study was conducted at Mapifia, Magalang for 21 days to determine the acceptance of mineral blocks using different materials to the carabaos. The test carabaos were given two treatments to consume the mineral block at certain period of time. The data gathered was used to determine the consumption, feed intake and palatability rate. Average Mean, Standard Deviation, and T-test were used as statistical tools to analyze the given data. Results show the comparison in consumption between two treatments. Mineral block (T2) has higher average consumption of the carabaos with a value of 635.10g than mineral block (T1) with a value of 536.67g. Using T-test, it reveals that the treatments were not significant at 95% level of significance since p-value is higher than 0.05, which is 0.097 and mineral block (T2) has higher standard deviation than mineral block (T1) with a value of 497.81g and 277.46g, respectively. The feed imtake of the carabaos in both treatments became faster compared before it was given mineral blocks. There was a difference in palatability of mineral blocks between two treatments. Mineral block (T2) is «ore palatable compared to mineral block (T1), with a value of 127.02g and 107.33g, espectively. T-test, revealed that the treatments were not significant at 95% level of ignificance since p-value is higher than 0.05, which is 0.097. Also, treatment 2 has igher standard deviation than treatment 1 with a value of 99.56g and 55.49¢, spectively. The total cost of producing 110 mineral blocks for treatment 1 was Php 2,040.50 d the total cost of producing 110 mineral blocks for treatment 2 was Php 2,132.00. The st difference between treatments was Php 91.50.
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Samson, Sidney C.,
Relator term Adviser.
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Collection Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
      Not for loan BSAg Eng'g PSAU OLM PSAU OLM Dissertation, Theses 01/30/2023   UT Se4 2021 UT12331 04/08/2025 04/08/2025 Theses